SECTION 32 (INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932)



 RETIREMENT OF A PARTNER (SECTION 32):

 (1) A partner may retire:

    (a) with the consent of all the other partners;

    (b) in accordance with an express agreement by the partners; or

     (c) where the partnership is at will, by giving notice in writing to all the other partners of his intention to retire.

(2) A retiring partner may be discharged from any liability to any third party for acts of the firm done before his retirement by an agreement made by him with such third party and the partners of the reconstituted firm, and such agreement may be implied by a course of dealing between the third party and the reconstituted firm after he had knowledge of the retirement.

(3) Notwithstanding the retirement of a partner from a firm, he and the partners continue to be liable as partners to third parties for any act done by any of them which would have been an act of the firm if done before the retirement, until public notice is given of the retirement:

Provided that a retired partner is not liable to any third party who deals with the firm without knowing that he was a partner.

(4) Notices under sub-section (3) may be given by the retired partner or by any partner of the reconstituted firm. 

Analysis of section 32:

A partner is said to retire when he ceases to be a member of the firm without bringing to an end the subsisting relations between the other members, or between the firm and third parties. The term ‘does not cover the case where a partner withdraws from a firm by dissolving it, which should properly be referred as a dissolution and not as a retirement. Retirement of a partner from a firm does not dissolve it.

Vishnu Chandra Vs. Chandrika Prasad [Supreme Court]

The Supreme Court in Vishnu Chandra Vs. Chandrika Prasad, held that the expression‘if any partner wants to dissociate from the partnership business’, in a clause of the partnership deed which was being construed, comprehends a situation where a partner wants to retire from the partnership. The expression clearly indicated that in the event of retirement, the partnership business will not come to an end. 

Example:

Mere retirement of a partner, who was the tenant of the premises in which the partnership business was carried out, would not result in assignment of the tenancy rights in favour of the remaining partners even though the retiring partner ceases to have any right, title or interest in the business as such.

Liabilities of an outgoing partner: As we have already stated earlier, a retiring partner continues to be liable to third party for acts of the firm after his retirement until public notice of his retirement has been given either by himself or by any other partner. But the retired partner will not be liable to any third party if the latter deals with the firm without knowing that the former was partner.

The liability of a retired partner to the third parties continues until a public notice of his retirement has been given. As regards the liability for acts of the firm done before his retirement, the retiring partner remains liable for the same, unless there is an agreement made by him with the third party concerned and the partners of the reconstituted firm. Such an agreement may be implied by a course of dealings between the third party and the reconstituted firm after he had knowledge of the retirement.

If the partnership is at will, the partner by giving notice in writing to all the other partners of his intention to retire will be deemed to be relieved as a partner without giving a public notice to this euect.

No comments:

Post a Comment