Showing posts with label INDIAN ECONOMY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label INDIAN ECONOMY. Show all posts

OVERSEAS DIRECT INVESTMENT BY INDIAN COMPANIES


 OVERSEAS DIRECT INVESTMENT BY INDIAN COMPANIES
  • Integration of the Indian economy with the rest of the world is evident not only in terms of higher level of FDI inflows but also in terms of increasing level of FDI outflows as overseas investments by the Indian entrepreneurs in joint ventures (JV) and wholly owned subsidiaries (WOS). Outbound investments from India have undergone substantial changes not only in terms of size but also in terms of geographical spread and sectoral composition. 
  • Outward Foreign Direct Investment (OFDI) from India stood at US$ 1.86 billion in the month of June, 2016.The overseas investments have been primarily driven by resource seeking, market seeking or technology seeking motives. Many Indian IT firms like Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, WIPRO, and Satyam acquired global contracts and established overseas offices in developed economies to be close to their key clients.
  •  Of late, there has been a surge in resource seeking overseas investments by Indian companies, especially to acquire energy resources in Australia, Indonesia and Africa. Indian entrepreneurs are also choosing investment destinations in countries such as Mauritius, Singapore, British Virgin Islands, and the Netherlands on account of higher tax benefits they provide.
  • At present, any Indian investor can make overseas direct investment in any bona- fide activity except in certain real estate activities. This has been made possible by progressive relaxation of the capital controls and simplification of procedures for outbound investments from India. 
  • For example, the annual overseas investment ceiling to establish joint ventures (JV) and wholly owned subsidiaries has been raised to US$ 125,000 from US$ 75,000. The RBI has also relaxed norms for foreign investment by Indian corporates by raising the borrowing limit. Policies in respect of foreign investments undergo far reaching changes from time to time. (Learners are expected to keep pace with the modifications in government policy in respect of inbound and outbound foreign investments).

FDI IN INDIA


 FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN INDIA (FDI)
  • The import-substitution strategy of industrialisation followed by India post independence stressed on an extremely careful and selective approach while formulating FDI policy. Extensive controls imposed by the government severely restricted the inflow of foreign capital to India.
  •  The enactment of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973 consolidated the regulatory framework with stipulations of upto 40 per cent of foreign equity holding in a joint venture. The Industrial Policy announcements of 1980 and 1982 and the Technology Policy Statement (1983) provided for a moderately lenient attitude towards foreign investments by endorsement of manufacturing exports as well as modernisation of industries through liberalised imports of capital goods and technology. 
  • This was supplemented by trade liberalisation measures in the form of tariff reduction and shifting of large number of items from import licensing to Open General Licensing (OGL).
  • The most important shift in investment policy occurred when India embarked upon economic liberalisation and reforms programme in 1991 to raise its growth potential and to integrate it with the world economy. Further reforms in subsequent years put in place a series of measures directed towards liberalizing foreign investments and for ensuring access to foreign technology and funding.
  • The government’s strategy favouring foreign investments and the prevalent robust business environment have ensured that foreign capital keeps flowing into the country. The government initiatives such as automatic approval of FDI, simplification of procedures, setting up of Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB abolished wef May 2017), signing of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency Protocol for protection of foreign investments, permitting use of foreign trade marks and brand names, 100% FDI in multitude of sectors , enactment of Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), passing of the SEZ Act in 2005, Special Economic Zones (SEZ), support to mergers ,acquisitions and green field investments, and encouragement to foreign technology collaboration agreements are a few such measures.
  • Apart from being a critical driver of economic growth, foreign direct investment (FDI) is a major source of non-debt financial resource for the economic development of India. According to United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)’s World Investment Report 2016, India ranks as the tenth highest recipient of foreign direct investment globally in 2015 receiving $44 billion of investment that year compared to $35 billion in 2014. India has also moved up by one rank to become the sixth most preferred investment destination. 
  • According to the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), the total FDI investments India received during April - September 2016 rose 30 per cent year-on-year to US$ 21.6 billion.
  •  During the period, the services sector attracted the highest FDI equity inflow (US$ 5.29 billion), followed by telecommunications (US$ 2.79 billion), and trading (US$ 1.48 billion). Also, India received the maximum FDI equity inflows from Mauritius (US$ 5.85 billion) followed by Singapore, Netherlands, Japan and the USA. 
  • With the government taking steps to improve the ease of doing business and to relax regulations, foreign direct investment into the country surged by 60 per cent to $4.68 billion in November 2016 from $2.93 billion in November 2015. 
  • Currently, an Indian company may receive foreign direct investment either through ‘automatic route’ without any prior approval either of the Government or the Reserve Bank of India or through ‘government route’ with prior approval of the Government. 
  • An Indian Company can receive foreign investment by issue of ‘FDI compliant instruments’ namely: equity shares, fully and mandatorily convertible preference shares and debentures, partly paid equity shares and warrants. These have to be issued in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the SEBI guidelines, as applicable. 
All foreign investments are repatriable (net of applicable taxes) except in cases where the investment is made or held on non-repatriation basis or where the sectoral condition specifically mentions non-repatriation. Further, dividends/ profits (net of applicable taxes), on foreign investments, being current income can be remitted outside India through an Authorised Dealer bank. Only NRIs are allowed to set up partnership/ proprietorship concerns in India on non-repatriation basis.In India, foreign investment is prohibited in the following sectors:

(i) Lottery business including Government / private lottery, online lotteries, etc.

(ii) Gambling and betting including casinos etc.

(iii) Chit funds

(iv) Nidhi company

(v) Trading in Transferable Development Rights (TDRs)

(vi) Real Estate Business or Construction of Farm Houses

(vii) Manufacturing of cigars, cheroots, cigarillos and cigarettes, of tobacco or of tobacco substitutes

(viii)Activities / sectors not open to private sector investment e.g. atomic energy and railway operations (other than permitted activities).

Foreign technology collaboration in any form including licensing for franchise, trademark, brand name, management contract is also prohibited for lottery business and gambling and betting activities.

With the objective of making India the most open economy in the world for FDI and for providing major impetus to employment and job creation, the FDI regime was radically liberalized on 20-June-2016. Changes introduced in the FDI policy include increase in sectoral caps, bringing more activities under automatic route and easing of conditions for foreign investment. These include easing of FDI in defence sector, e-commerce, in respect of food products manufactured or produced in India, pharmaceuticals (Greenfield and Brownfield), airports (both Greenfield and Brownfield),airport transport services, private security agencies, animal husbandry, establishment of branch offices, liaison office or project office, teleports, direct to home cable networks, mobile TV and headend-in-the sky broadcasting service and single brand retail trading.

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH FDI


 POTENTIAL PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

In the above section, we have seen that a wide variety of benefits may result from an inflow of foreign direct investment. These gains do not occur in all cases, nor do they occur in the same magnitude. Despite the arguments which vehemently favour direct investments in host countries, many are highly critical of the impact of foreign capital, especially on developing economies. They argue that foreign entities are highly focused on profits and have an eye on exploiting the natural resources and are almost always not genuinely interested in the development needs of host countries. Foreign capital is perceived by the critics as an instrument of imperialism, or as a perpetrator of dependence and inequality both between nations and within nations.

Following are the general arguments put forth against the entry of foreign capital.

1. FDIs are likely to concentrate on capital-intensive methods of production and service so that they need to hire only relatively few workers. Such technology is inappropriate for a labour-abundant country as it does not support generation of jobs which is a crucial requirement to address poverty and unemployment which are the two fundamental areas of concern for the less developed countries.

2. The inherent tendency of FDI flows to move towards regions or states which are well endowed in terms of natural resources and availability of infrastructure has the potential to accentuate regional disparity. Foreign capital is also criticized for accentuating the already existing income inequalities in the host country.

3. In the context of developing countries, it is usually alleged that the inflow of foreign capital may cause the domestic governments to slow down its efforts to generate more domestic savings, especially when tax mechanisms are difficult to implement. If the foreign corporations are able to secure incentives in the form of tax holidays or similar provisions, the host country loses tax revenues.

4. Often, the foreign firms may partly finance their domestic investments by borrowing funds in the host country's capital market. This action can raise interest rates in the host country and lead to a decline in domestic investments through ‘crowding-out’ effect. Moreover, suppliers of funds in developing economies would prefer foreign firms due to perceived lower risks and such shifts of funds may divert capital away from investments which are crucial for the development needs of the country.

5. The expected benefits from easing of the balance of payments situation might remain unrealised or narrowed down due to the likely instability in the balance of payments and the exchange rate. Obviously, FDI brings in more foreign exchange, improves the balance of payments and raises the value of the host country's currency in the exchange markets. However, when imported inputs need to be obtained or when profits are repatriated, a strain is placed on the host country's balance of payments and the home currency leading to its depreciation. Such instabilities jeopardize long-term economic planning. Foreign corporations also have a tendency to use their usual input suppliers which can lead to increased imports. Also, large scale repatriation of profits can be stressful on the balance of payments.

6. Jobs that require expertise and entrepreneurial skills for creative decision making may generally be retained in the home country and therefore the host country is left with routine management jobs that demand only lower levels of skills and ability. The argument of possible human resource development and acquisition of new innovative skills through FDI may not be realized in reality.

7. High profit orientation of foreign direct investors tend to promote a distorted pattern of production and investment such that production could get concentrated on items of elite and popular consumption and on non-essential items.

8. Foreign entities are usually accused of being anti-ethical as they frequently resort to methods like aggressive advertising and anticompetitive practices which would induce market distortions.

9. A large foreign firm with deep pockets may undercut a competitive local industry because of various advantages (such as in technology) possessed by it and may even drive out domestic firms from the industry resulting in serious problems of displacement of labour. The foreign firms may also exercise a high degree of market power and exist as monopolists with all the accompanying disadvantages of monopoly. The high growth of wages inforeign corporations can influence a similar escalation in the domestic corporations which are not able to cover this increase with growth of productivity. The result is decreasing competitiveness of domestic companies which might prove detrimental to the long term interests of industrial development of the host country.

10. FDI usually involves domestic companies ‘off –shoring’, or shifting jobs and operations abroad in pursuit of lower operating costs and consequent higher profits. This has deleterious effects on employment potential of home country.

11. The continuance of lower labour or environmental standards in host countries is highly appreciated by the profit seeking foreign enterprises. This is of great concern because efforts to converge such standards often fail to receive support from interested parties.

12. At times, there is potential national security considerations involved when foreign firms function in the territory of the host country, especially when acute hostilities prevail.

13. FDI may have adverse impact on the host country's commodity terms of trade (defined as the price of a country's exports divided by the price of its imports). This could occur if the investments go into production of export goods and the country is a large country in the sale of its exports. Thus, increased exports drive down the price of exports relative to the price of imports.

14. FDI is also held responsible by many for ruthless exploitation of natural resources and the possible environmental damage.

15. With substantial FDI in developing countries there is a strong possibility of emergence of a dual economy with a developed foreign sector and an underdeveloped domestic sector.

16. Perhaps the most disturbing of the various charges levied against foreign direct investment is that a large foreign investment sector can exert excessive amount of power in a variety of ways so that there is potential loss of control by host country over domestic policies and therefore the less developed host country’s sovereignty is put at risk. Mighty multinational firms are often criticized of corruption issues, unduly influencing policy making and evasion of corporate social responsibility.

No general assessment can be made regarding whether the benefits of FDI outweigh the costs. Each country's situation and each firm's investment must beexamined in the light of various considerations and a judgment about the desirability or otherwise of the investment should be arrived at.

Many safeguards and performance requirements are put in place by developed and developing countries to improve the ratio of benefits to costs associated with foreign capital. A few examples are: domestic content requirements on inputs, reservation of certain key sectors to domestic firms, requirement of a minimum percent of local employees, ceiling on repatriation of profits, local sourcing requirements and stipulations for full or partial export of output to earn scarce foreign exchange.

BENEFITS OF FDI


 BENEFITS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

The benefits from and concerns about FDI are widely discussed and well documented. While recognizing the fact that there are also benefits and costs to the home country from capital outflow, in this unit we focus only on host-country effects of FDI with particular attention to the developing countries. Following are the benefits ascribed to foreign investments:

1. Entry of foreign enterprises usually fosters competition and generates a competitive environment in the host country. The domestic enterprises are compelled to compete with the foreign enterprises operating in the domestic market. This results in positive outcomes in the form of cost-reducing and quality-improving innovations, higher efficiency and increasing variety of better products and services at lower prices ensuring wider choice and welfare for consumers

2. International capital allows countries to finance more investment than can be supported by domestic savings. The provision of increased capital to work with labour and other resources available in the host country can enhance the total output (as well as output per unit of input) flowing from the factors of production.

3. From the perspective of emerging and developing countries, FDI can accelerate growth and foster economic development by providing the much needed capital, technological know-how, management skills and marketing methods and critical human capital skills in the form of managers and technicians. The spill-over effects of the new technologies usually spread beyond the foreign corporations. In addition, the new technology can clearly enhance the recipient country's production possibilities.

4. Competition for FDI among national governments also has helped to promote political reforms important to attract foreign investors, including legal systems and macroeconomic policies.

5. Since FDI involves setting up of production base (in terms of factories, power plants, etc.) it generates direct employment in the recipient country. Subsequent FDI as well as domestic investments propelled in the downstream and upstream projects that come up in multitude of other services generate multiplier effects on employment and income.

6. FDI not only creates direct employment opportunities but also, through backward and forward linkages, generate indirect employment opportunities.This impact is particularly important if the recipient country is a developing country with an excess supply of labour caused by population pressure.

7. Foreign direct investments also promote relatively higher wages for skilled jobs. More indirect employment will be generated to persons in the lower-end services sector occupations thereby catering to an extent even to the less educated and unskilled persons engaged in those units.

8. Foreign corporations provide better access to foreign markets. Unlike portfolio investments, FDI generally entails people-to-people relations and is usually considered as a promoter of bilateral and international relations. Greater openness to foreign capital leads to higher national dependence on international investors, making the cost of discords higher.

9. There is also greater possibility for the promotion of ancillary units resulting in job creation and skill development for workers.

10. Foreign enterprises possessing marketing information with their global network of marketing are in a unique position to utilize these strengths to promote the exports of developing countries. If the foreign capital produces goods with export potential, the host country is in a position to secure scarce foreign exchange which can be used to import needed capital equipments or materials to assist the country's development plans or to ease its external debt servicing.

11. If the host country is in a position to implement effective tax measures, the foreign investment projects also would act as a source of new tax revenue which can be used for development projects.

12. It is likely that foreign investments enter into industries in which scale economies can be realized so that consumer prices might be lowered. Domestic firms might not always be able to generate the necessary capital to achieve the cost reductions associated with large-scale production.

13. Increased competition resulting from the inflow of foreign direct investments facilitates weakening of the market power of domestic monopolies resulting in a possible increase in output and fall in prices.

14. Since FDI has a distinct advantage over the external borrowings, it is considered to have a favourable impact on the host country’s balance of payment position, and1. Better work culture and higher productivity standards brought in by foreign firms may possibly induce productivity related awareness and may also contribute to overall human resources development.

15. Better work culture and higher productivity standards brought in by foreign firms may possibly induce productivity related awareness and may also contribute to overall human resources development.

MODES OF FDI


 MODES OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI)

Foreign direct investments can be made in a variety of ways, such as:

(i) Opening of a subsidiary or associate company in a foreign country,

(ii) Equity injection into an overseas company,

(iii) Acquiring a controlling interest in an existing foreign company,

(iv) Mergers and acquisitions(M&A)

(v) Joint venture with a foreign company.

(vi) Green field investment (establishment of a new overseas affiliate for freshly starting production by a parent company).

REASONS FOR FDI


 REASONS FOR FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
As we know, economic prosperity and the relative abundance of capital are necessary prerequisites for export of capital to other countries. Many economies and organisations have accumulation of huge mass of reserve capital seeking profitable use. The primary aim of economic agents being maximisation of their economic interests, the opportunity to generate profits available in other countries often entices such entities to make investments in other countries. The chief motive for shifting of capital between different regions or between different industries is the expectation of higher rate of return than what is possible in the home country. Investment in a host country may be found profitable by foreign firms because of some firm-specific knowledge or assets (such as superior management skills or an important patent) that enable the foreign firm to gainfully outperform the host country's domestic firms. There are many other reasons (as listed below) for international capital movements which have found adequate empirical support. Investments move across borders on account of:

(i) the increasing interdependence of national economies and the consequent trade relations and international industrial cooperation established among them

(ii) internationalisation of production and investment of transnational corporations in their subsidiaries and affiliates.

(iii) desire to reap economies of large-scale operation arising from technological growth

(iv) lack of feasibility of licensing agreements with foreign producers in view of the rapid rate of technological innovations

(v) necessity to retain direct control of production knowledge or managerial skill (usually found in monopolistic or oligopolistic markets) that could easily and profitably be utilized by corporations

(vi) desire to procure a promising foreign firm to avoid future competition and the possible loss of export markets

(vii) risk diversification so that recessions or downturns may be experienced with reduced severity

(viii) shared common language or common boundaries and possible saving in time and transport costs because of geographical proximity

(ix) necessity to retain complete control over its trade patents and to ensure consistent quality and service or for creating monopolies in a global context

(x) promoting optimal utilization of physical, human, financial and other resources

(xi) desire to capture large and rapidly growing high potential emerging markets with substantially high and growing population

(xii) ease of penetration into the markets of those countries that have established import restrictions such as blanket bans, high customs duties or non-tariff barriers which make it difficult for the foreign firm to sell in the host-country market by ‘getting behind the tariff wall’.

(xiii) lower environmental standards in the host country and the consequent relative savings in costs

(xiv) stable political environment and overall favourable investment climate in the host country

(xv) higher degree of openness to foreign capital exhibited by the recipient country and the prevalence of preferential investment systems such as special economic zones to encourage direct foreign investments

(xvi) the strategy to obtain control of strategic raw material or resource so as to ensure their uninterrupted supply at the lowest possible price; usually a form of vertical integration

(xvii) desire to secure access to minerals or raw material deposits located elsewhere and earn profits through processing them to finished form (Eg.FDI in petroleum)

(xviii) the existence of low relative wages in the host country because of relative labour abundance coupled with shortage and high cost of labour in capital exporting countries, especially when the production process is labour intensive.

(xix) lower level of economic efficiency in host countries and identifiable gaps in development

(xx) tax differentials and tax policies of the host country which support direct investment. However, a low tax burden cannot compensate for a generally fragile and unattractive FDI environment

(xxi) inevitability of defensive investments in order to preserve a firm’s competitive position

(xxii) high gross domestic product and high per capita income coupled with their high rate of growth . There are also other philanthropic objectives such as strengthening of socio-economic infrastructure, alleviation of poverty and maintenance of ecological balance of the host country ,and

(xxiii) prevalence of high standards of social amenities and possibility of good quality of life in the host country
                                                                     Table 4.5.2

                                 Host Country Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment
Economic Determinants
Market -seeking FDI:
Market size and per capita income Market growth
Access to regional and global markets Country-specific consumer preferences Structure of markets
Resource - or asset-seeking FDI:
Raw materials
Low -cost unskilled labour Availability of skilled labour
Technological, innovative, and other created assets (e.g., brand names)
Physical infrastructure
Policy Framework
Economic, political, and social stability
Rules regarding entry and operations
Standards   of    treatment   of                    foreign affiliates
Policies on functioning and structure of markets (e.g., regarding competition, mergers)
International    agreements    on     FDI Privatization policy
Trade policies and coherence of FDI and trade policies
Tax policy
Business Facilitation
Investment promotion (including image building   and                  investment-generating
Efficiency -seeking FDI:
Costs of above physical and human resources and assets
(including      an       adjustment       for productivity)
Other input costs (e.g., intermediate products, transport costs)
Membership of country in a regional integration agreement, which could be conducive to forming regional corporate networks
activities    and    investment-facilitation services)
Investment incentives
"Hassle costs" (related to corruption and administrative efficiency)
Social amenities (e.g., bilingual schools, quality of life)
After-investment services
Source :International economics (7th ed) International Economics, Dennis R. Appleyard; Alfred J. Field; Steven L. Cobb(P237)

Factors in the host country discouraging inflow of foreign investments are infrastructure lags, high rates of inflation, balance of payment deficits, poor literacy and low labour skills, rigidity in the labour market, bureaucracy and corruption, unfavourable tax regime, cumbersome legal formalities and delays, small size of market and lack of potential for its growth, political instability, absence of well- defined property rights, exchange rate volatility, poor track-record of investments, prevalence of non-tariff barriers, stringent regulations, lack of openness, language barriers, high rates of industrial disputes, lack of security to life and property, lack of facilities for immigration and employment of foreign technical and administrative personnel, double taxation and lack of a general spirit of friendliness towards foreign investors.

FOREIGN PORTFOLIO INVESTMENT


 FOREIGN PORTFOLIO INVESTMENT (FPI)
  • Foreign portfolio investment is the flow of what economists call ‘financial capital’ rather than ‘real capital’ and does not involve ownership or control on the part of the investor. Examples of foreign portfolio investment are the deposit of funds in an Indian or a British bank by an Italian company or the purchase of a bond (a certificate of indebtedness) of a Swiss company or of the Swiss government by a citizen or company based in France. 
  • Unlike FDI, portfolio capital, in general, moves to investment in financial stocks, bonds and other financial instruments and is effected largely by individuals and institutions through the mechanism of capital market. These flows of financial capital have their immediate effects on balance of payments or exchange rates rather than on production or income generation.
  • Foreign portfolio investment (FPI) is not concerned with either manufacture of goods or with provision of services. Such investors also do not have any intention of exercising voting power or controlling or managing the affairs of the company in whose securities they invest. The singular intention of a foreign portfolio investor is to earn a remunerative return through investment in foreign securities and is primarily concerned about the safety of their capital, the likelihood of appreciation in its value, and the return generated. 
  • Logically, portfolio capital moves to a recipient country which has revealed its potential for higher returns and profitability.
Following international standards, portfolio investments are characterised by lower stake in companies with their total stake in a firm at below 10 percent. It is also noteworthy that unlike the FDIs, these investments are typically of short term nature, and therefore, are not intended to enhance the productive capacity of an economy by the creation of capital assets.

Portfolio investors will evaluate, on a separate basis, the prospects of each independent unit in which they might invest and may often shift their capital with changes in these prospects. Therefore, portfolio investments are, to a large extent, expected to be speculative. Once investor confidence is shaken, such capital has a tendency to speedily shift from one country to another, occasionally creating financial crisis for the host country.

                                                     Table 4.5.1
                     Foreign direct investment (FDI) VS Foreign portfolio investment (FPI)

Foreign direct investment (FDI)           Foreign portfolio investment (FPI)
Investment     involves    creation    of physical assets
Investment is only in financial assets
Has a long term interest and therefore remain invested for long
Only short term interest and generally remain invested for short periods
Relatively difficult to withdraw
Relatively easy to withdraw
Not inclined to be speculative
Speculative in nature
Often accompanied by technology transfer
Not accompanied by technology transfer
Direct   impact   on   employment   of labour and wages
No direct impact on employment of labour and wages
Enduring interest in management and control
No abiding interest in management and control
Securities are held with significant degree of influence by the investor on the management of the enterprise
Securities are held purely as a financial investment and no significant degree of influence on the management of the enterprise

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT


 FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI )
  • When we talk about international investments, we should first of all distinguish between two types of investments namely, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI). Foreign direct investment is defined as a process whereby the resident of one country (i.e. home country) acquires ownership of an asset in another country (i.e. the host country) and such movement of capital involves ownership, control as well as management of the asset in the host country. 
  • Foreign direct investment (FDI), according to IMF manual on 'Balance of payments' is "all investments involving a long term relationship and reflecting a lasting interest and control of a resident entity in one economy in an enterprise resident in an economy other than that of the direct investor”. This typically occurs through acquisition of more than 10 percent of the shares of the target asset. Direct investment comprises not only the initial transaction establishing the relationship between the investor and the enterprise, but also all subsequent transactions between them and among affiliated enterprises, both incorporated and unincorporated.
  • According to the IMF and OECD definitions, the acquisition of at least ten percent of the ordinary shares or voting power in a public or private enterprise by non- resident investors makes it eligible to be categorized as foreign direct investment (FDI). India also follows the same pattern of classification. FDI has three components, viz., equity capital, reinvested earnings and other direct capital in the form of intra-company loans between direct investors (parent enterprises) and affiliate enterprises.
  • Foreign direct investors may be individuals, incorporated or unincorporated private or public enterprises, associated groups of individuals or enterprises, governments or government agencies, estates, trusts, or other organizations or any combination of the above mentioned entities. The main forms of direct investments are: the opening of overseas companies, including the establishment of subsidiaries or branches, creation of joint ventures on a contract basis, joint development of natural resources and purchase or annexation of companies in the country receiving foreign capital.
Direct investments are real investments in factories, assets, land, inventories etc. and involve foreign ownership of production facilities. The investor retains control over the use of the invested capital and also seeks the power to exercise control over decision making to the extent of its equity participation. The lasting interest implies the existence of a long-term relationship between the direct investor and the enterprise and a significant degree of influence by the investor on the management of the enterprise.
Based on the nature of foreign investments, FDI may be categorized as horizontal, vertical or conglomerate.

i) A horizontal direct investment is said to take place when the investor establishes the same type of business operation in a foreign country as it operates in its home country, for example, a cell phone service provider based in the United States moving to India to provide the same service.

ii) A vertical investment is one under which the investor establishes or acquires a business activity in a foreign country which is different from the investor’s main business activity yet in some way supplements its major activity. For example; an automobile manufacturing company may acquire an interest in a foreign company that supplies parts or raw materials required for the company.

iii) A conglomerate type of foreign direct investment is one where an investor makes a foreign investment in a business that is unrelated to its existing business in its home country. This is often in the form of a joint venture with a foreign firm already operating in the industry as the investor has no previous experience.

Yet another category of investments is ‘two- way direct foreign investments’ which are reciprocal investments between countries that occur when some industries are more advanced in one nation (for example, the computer industry in the United States), while other industries are more efficient in other nations (such as the automobile industry in Japan).

TYPES OF FOREIGN CAPITAL


 TYPES OF FOREIGN CAPITAL

The term 'foreign capital' is a comprehensive one and includes any inflow of capital into the home country from abroad and therefore, we need to be clear about the distinction between movement of capital and foreign investment. Foreign capital may flow into an economy in different ways. Some of the important components of foreign capital flows are:

1. Foreign aid or assistance which may be:

(a) Bilateral or direct inter government grants

(b) Multilateral aid from many governments who pool funds to international organizations like the World Bank

(c) Tied aid with strict mandates regarding the use of money or untied aid where there are no such stipulations

(d) Foreign grants which are voluntary transfer of resources by governments, institutions, agencies or organizations

2. Borrowings which may take different forms such as:
(a) Direct inter government loans

(b) Loans from international institutions (e.g. world bank, IMF, ADB)

(c) Soft loans for e.g. from affiliates of World Bank such as IDA

(d) External commercial borrowing, and

(e) Trade credit facilities

3. Deposits from non-resident Indians (NRI)

4. Investments in the form of :

(i) Foreign portfolio investment (FPI) in bonds, stocks and securities, and

(ii) Foreign direct investment(FDI) in industrial, commercial and similar other enterprises

INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MOVEMENTS


 INTRODUCTION

In unit one, our focus was on international trade in goods and services. of late, we find enormous increase in international movement of capital. This phenomenon has received a great deal of attention from not just economists and policy-makers but people in different walks of life including workers’ organisations and members of the civil society. In this unit, we shall look into international capital movements; more precisely into why do capital move across national boundaries and what are the consequences of such capital movements. We shall also briefly touch upon the FDI situation in India.

IMPACT OF EXCHANGE RATE


 IMPACTS OF EXCHANGE RATE FLUCTUATIONS ON DOMESTIC ECONOMY
  • The fact that among the macroeconomic variables, exchange rates are perhaps the most closely monitored, analyzed and manipulated economic measure highlights the overwhelming importance of exchange rates in an economy. The unpredictability of the markets caused by exchange rate changes can profoundly influence the economy of countries. 
  • As a matter of fact, it is most likely that exchange rate fluctuations may determine a country’s economic performance. Knowledge about the possible effects of exchange rate fluctuations enables us to have an understanding of the appropriateness of exchange rate policy, especially in developing countries. 
In the discussion that follows, we shall examine the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the real economy.

The developments in the foreign exchange markets affect the domestic economy both directly and indirectly. The direct impact of fluctuations in rates is initially felt by economic agents who are directly involved in international trade or international finance. In judging the impacts of exchange rate fluctuations, it becomes, therefore, necessary to evaluate their effects on trade, investments, consumption output, economic growth and inflation.

 (i) Exchange rates have a very significant role in determining the nature and extent of a country's trade. Changes in import and export prices will lead to changes in import and export volumes, causing changes in import spending and export revenue.

(ii)
Fluctuations in the exchange rate affect the economy by changing the relative prices of domestically-produced and foreign-produced goods and services. All else equal (or other things remaining the same), an appreciation of a country’s currency raises the relative price of its exports and lowers the relative price of its imports. Conversely, a depreciation lowers the relative price of a country’s exports and raises the relative price of its imports. When a country’s currency depreciates, foreigners find that its exports are cheaper and domestic residents find that imports from abroad are more expensive. An appreciation has opposite effects i.e foreigners pay more for the country’s products and domestic consumers pay less for foreign products. For example; assume that there is devaluation or depreciation of Indian Rupee from $1=Rs 65/ to $1=Rs 70/.A foreigner who spends ten dollars on buying Indian goods will, post devaluation, get goods worth Rs.700/ instead of Rs 650/ prior to depreciation. An importer has to pay for his purchases in foreign currency, and, therefore, a resident of India, who wants to import goods worth $1 will have to pay Rs 70/ instead of Rs 65/ prior to depreciation. Importers will be affected most as they will have to pay more rupees on importing products. On the contrary, exporters will be benefitted as goods exported abroad will fetch dollars which can now be converted to more rupees.

(iii) Exchange rate changes affect economic activity in the domestic economy. A depreciation of domestic currency primarily increases the price of foreign goods relative to goods produced in the home country and diverts spending from foreign goods to domestic goods. Increased demand, both for domestic import-competing goods and for exports encourages economic activity and creates output expansion. Overall, the outcome of exchange rate depreciation is an expansionary impact on the economy at an aggregate level. The positive effect of currency depreciation, however, largely depends on whether the switching of demand has taken place in the right direction and in the right amount, as well as on the capacity of the home economy to meet the additional demand by supplying more goods to meet the increased domestic demand.

(iv) By lowering export prices, currency depreciation helps increase the international competitiveness of domestic industries, increases the volume of exports and promotes trade balance. However, a point to be noted is that the price changes in exports and imports may counterbalance or offset each other only if trade is in balance and terms of trade are not changed. In case the country’s imports exceed exports, the net result is a reduction in real income within the country.

(v) We have seen above that by changing the relative prices, depreciation may increase windfall profits in export and import-competing industries. However, depreciation may also cause contractionary effects. We shall see how it may happen. In an under developed or semi industrialized country, where - inputs (such as oil) and components for manufacturing are mostly imported and cannot be domestically produced, increased import prices will increase firms’ cost of production , push domestic prices up and decrease real output.

(vi) For an economy where exports are significantly high, a depreciated currency would mean a lot of gain. In addition, if exports originate from labour-intensive industries, increased export prices will have positive effect employment income and potentially on wages.

(vii) Depreciation is also likely to add to consumer price inflation in the short run, directly through its effect on prices of imported consumer goods and also due to increased demand for domestic goods. The impact will be greater if the composition of domestic consumption baskets consists more of imported goods. Indirectly, cost push inflation may result through possible escalation in the cost of imported inputs. In such an inflationary situation, the central bank of the country will have no incentive to cut policy rates as this is likely to increase the burden of all types of borrowers including businesses.

(viii) When a country’s currency depreciates, production for exports and of import substitutes become more profitable. Therefore, factors of production will be induced to move into the tradable goods sectors and out of the non tradable goods sectors. The reverse will be true when the currency appreciates. These types of resource movements involve economic wastes.

(ix) A depreciation or devaluation is also likely to affect a country’s terms of trade. (Terms of trade is the ratio of the price of a country’s export commodity to the price of its import commodity) Since the prices of both exports and imports rise in terms of the domestic currency as a result of depreciation or devaluation, the terms of trade of the nation can rise , fall or remain unchanged, depending on whether price of exports rises by more than , less than or same percentages as price of imports.

(x) The fiscal health of a country whose currency depreciates is likely to be affected with rising export earnings and import payments and consequent impact on current account balance. A widening current account deficit is a danger signal as far as growth prospects of the overall economy is concerned. If export earnings rise faster than the imports spending then current account will improve otherwise not.

(xi) Companies that have borrowed in foreign exchange through external commercial borrowings (ECBs) but have been careless and did not sufficiently hedge these loans against foreign exchange risks would also be negatively impacted as they would require more domestic currency to repay their loans. A depreciated domestic currency would also increase their debt burden and lower their profits and impact their balance sheets adversely. These would signal investors who will be discouraged from investing in such companies.

(xii) Countries with foreign currency denominated government debts, currency depreciation will increase the interest burden and cause strain to the exchequer for repaying and servicing foreign debt. Fortunately, India’s has small proportion of public debt in foreign currency.

(xiii) Exchange rate fluctuations make financial forecasting more difficult for firms and larger amounts will have to be earmarked for insuring against exchange rate risks through hedging.

(xiv) With growth of investments across international boundaries, exchange rates have assumed special significance. Investors who have purchased a foreign asset, or the corporation which floats a foreign debt, will find themselves facing foreign exchange risk. Exchange rate movements have become the single most important factor affecting the value of investments on an international level. They are critical to business volumes, profit forecasts, investment plans and investment outcomes. Depreciating currency hits investor sentiments and has radical impact on patterns of international capital flows.

(xv) Foreign investors are likely to be indecisive or highly cautious before investing in a country which has high exchange rate volatility. Foreign capital inflows are characteristically vulnerable when local currency weakens. Therefore foreign portfolio investment flows into debt and equity as well as foreign direct investment flows are likely to shrink. This shoots up capital account deficits affecting the country’s fiscal health. If investor sentiments are such that they anticipate further depreciation, there may be large scale withdrawal of portfolio investments and huge redemptions through global exchange traded funds leading to further depreciation of domestic currency. This may result in    a highly volatile domestic equity market affecting the confidence of domestic investors. Reduced foreign investments also widen the gap between investments required for growth and actual investments. Over a period of time, unemployment is likely to mount in the economy.

With increasing dependence on imports, Indian economy has always felt the brunt of higher international prices of fuel impacting domestic transportation and overall cost of production which often triggered inflation, increase in oil and fertilizer subsidy bills, costly foreign travel, escalated foreign debt service payments and higher outstanding external commercial borrowings (or ECB) and government’s foreign debt. 

The other impacts of currency depreciation are:
(i) Windfall gains for export oriented sectors (such as IT sector, textile, pharmaceuticals, gems and jewelry in the case of India) because depreciating currency fetches more domestic currency per unit of foreign currency.

(ii) Remittances to homeland by non residents and businesses abroad fetches more in terms of domestic currency

(iii) Depreciation would enhance government revenues from import related taxes, especially if the country imports more of essential goods

(iv) Depreciation would result in higher amount of local currency for a given amount of foreign currency borrowings of government.

(v) Depreciation also can have a positive impact on country’s trade deficit as it makes imports more expensive for domestic consumers and exports cheaper for foreigners.

(vi) Depreciation also can have a positive impact on controlling spiraling gold imports (mostly wasteful) and thereby improve trade balance.

An appreciation of currency or a strong currency (or possibly an overvalued currency) makes the domestic currency more valuable and, therefore, can be exchanged for a larger amount of foreign currency. An appreciation will have the following consequences on real economy:

(i) An appreciation of currency raises the price of exports and, therefore, the quantity of exports would fall. Since imports become cheaper, we may expect an increase in the quantity of imports. Combining these two effects together, the domestic aggregate demand falls and, therefore, economic growth is likely to be negatively impacted.

(ii) The outcome of appreciation also depends on the stage of the business cycle as well. If appreciation sets in during the recessionary phase, the result would be a further fall in aggregate demand and higher levels of unemployment. If the economy is facing a boom, an appreciation of domestic currency would trim down inflationary pressures and soften the rate of growth of the economy.

(iii) An appreciation may cause reduction in the levels of inflation because imports are cheaper. Lower price of imported capital goods, components and raw materials lead to decrease in cost of production which reflects on decrease in prices. Additionally, decrease in aggregate demand tends to lower demand pull inflation. Living standards of people are likely to improve due to availability of cheaper consumer goods.

(iv) With increasing export prices, the competitiveness of domestic industry is adversely affected and, therefore, firms have greater incentives to introduce technological innovations and capital intensive production to cut costs to remain competitive.

(v) Increasing imports and declining exports are liable to cause larger deficits and worsen the current account. However, - the impact of appreciation on current account depends upon the elasticity of demand for exports and imports. Relatively inelastic demand for imports and exports may lead to an improvement in the current account position. Higher the price elasticity of demand for exports , greater would be the fall in demand and higher will be the fall in the aggregate value of exports. This will adversely affect the current account balance.

(vi) Loss of competitiveness will be insignificant if currency appreciation is because of strong fundamentals of the economy.

From the discussions in this unit, we understand that all countries would desire to have steady exchange rates to eliminate the risks and uncertainties associated with international trade and investments. However, nations may sometimes go in for tradeoffs with weaker exchange rate to stimulate exports and aggregate demand, or a stronger exchange rate to fight inflation. Learners may keep themselves well- informed on contemporary exchange rate developments and their implications on the economic welfare of countries.

DEVALUATION VS DEPRECIATION


DEVALUATION (REVALUATION) VS DEPRECIATION (APPRECIATION)
  • Devaluation is a deliberate downward adjustment in the value of a country's currency relative to another currency, group of currencies or standard. It is a monetary policy tool used by countries that have a fixed exchange rate or nearly fixed exchange rate regime and involves a discrete official reduction in the otherwise fixed par value of a currency.
  •  The monetary authority formally sets a new fixed rate with respect to a foreign reference currency or currency basket. In contrast, depreciation is a decrease in a currency's value (relative to other major currency benchmarks) due to market forces under a floating exchange rate and not due to any government or central bank policy actions.
  • Revaluation is the opposite of devaluation and the term refers to a discrete raising of the otherwise fixed par value of a nation’s currency. Appreciation, on the other hand, is a increase in a currency's value (relative to other major currencies) due to market forces under a floating exchange rate and not due to any government or central bank policy interventions.

CHANGE IN EXCHANGE RATE


 CHANGES IN EXCHANGE RATES
  • Changes in exchange rates portray depreciation or appreciation of one currency. The terms, ` currency appreciation’ and ‘currency depreciation’ describe the movements of the exchange rate. Currency appreciates when its value increases with respect to the value of another currency or a basket of other currencies.
  •  On the contrary, currency depreciates when its value falls with respect to the value of another currency or a basket of other currencies.
 We shall try to understand this with the help of an example.

Now suppose, the Rupee dollar exchange rate in the month of January is $1 = ` 65. And, we find that in the month of April it is $1 = ` 70. What does this indicate? In April, you will have to exchange a greater amount of Indian Rupees (`70) to get the same 1 US dollar. As such, the value of the Indian Rupee has gone down or Indian Rupee has depreciated in its value. Rupee depreciation here means that the rupee has become less valuable with respect to the U.S. dollar. Simultaneously, if you look at the value of dollar in terms of Rupees, you find that the value of the US dollar has increased in terms of the Indian Rupee. One dollar will now fetch ` 70 instead of ` 65 earlier. This is called appreciation of the US dollar. You might have observed that when one currency depreciates against another, the second currency must simultaneously appreciate against the first.

To put it more clearly:
  •  Home-currency depreciation (which is the same as foreign-currency appre- ciation) takes place when there is an increase in the home currency price of the foreign currency (or, alternatively, a decrease in the foreign currency price of the home currency). The home currency thus becomes relatively less valuable. 
  •  Home-currency appreciation or foreign-currency depreciation takes place when there is a decrease in the home currency price of foreign currency (or alternatively, an increase in the foreign currency price of home currency). The home currency thus becomes relatively more valuable. 
Under a floating rate system, if for any reason, the demand curve for foreign currency shifts to the right representing increased demand for foreign currency, and supply curve remains unchanged, then the exchange value of foreign currency rises and the domestic currency depreciates in value. This is illustrated in figure 4.4.2.
                                                                       Figure 4.4.2
                      Home-Currency Depreciation under Floating Exchange Rates



The market reaches equilibrium at point E with equilibrium exchange rate e eq. An increase in domestic demand for the foreign currency, with supply of dollars remaining constant, is represented by a rightward shift of the demand curve to D1$. The equilibrium exchange rate rises to e1. It means that more units of domestic currency (here Indian Rupees) are required to buy a unit of foreign exchange (dollar) and that the domestic currency (the Rupee) has depreciated.

We shall now examine what happens when there is an increase in the supply of dollars in the Indian market. This is illustrated in figure 4.4.3.
                                                              Figure 4.4.3
                           Home-Currency Appreciation under Floating Exchange Rates



An increase in the supply of foreign exchange shifts the supply curve to the right to S1 $ and as a consequence, the exchange rate declines to e1. It means, that lesser units of domestic currency (here Indian Rupees) are required to buy a unit of foreign exchange (dollar), and that the domestic currency (the Rupee) has appreciated.

As we are aware, in an open economy, firms and households use exchange rates to translate foreign prices into domestic currency terms. Exchange rates also permit us to compare the prices of goods and services produced in different countries. Furthermore, import or export prices could be expressed in terms of the same currency in the trading contract. This is the reason why exchange rate movements can affect intentional trade flows.

DETERMINATION OF NOMINAL EXCHANGE RATE


 DETERMINATION OF NOMINAL EXCHANGE RATE

As you already know, the key framework for analyzing prices is the operation of supply and demand in markets. Usually, the supply of and demand for foreign exchange in the domestic foreign exchange market determine the external value of the domestic currency, or in other words, a country’s exchange rate.

Individuals, institutions and governments participate in the foreign exchange market for a number of reasons. On the demand side, people desire foreign currency to:
 purchase goods and services from another country
  •  for unilateral transfers such as gifts, awards, grants, donations or endowments
  •  to make investment income payments abroad
  •  to purchase financial assets, stocks or bonds abroad
  •  to open a foreign bank account
  •  to acquire direct ownership of real capital, and
  •  for speculation and hedging activities related to risk-taking or risk-avoidance activity

The participants on the supply side operate for similar reasons. Thus, the supply of foreign currency to the home country results from purchases of home exports, unilateral transfers to home country, investment income payments, foreign direct investments and portfolio investments, placement of bank deposits and speculation.

We shall now look into how the foreign exchange markets work. Similar to any standard market, the exchange market also faces a downward-sloping demand curve and an upward-sloping supply curve.
                                                              Figure 4.4.1 
                                          Determination of Nominal Exchange Rate



The equilibrium rate of exchange is determined by the interaction of the supply and demand for a particular foreign currency. In figure 4.4.1, the demand curve (D$) and supply curve (S$ )of dollars intersect to determine equilibrium exchange rate eeq with Qe as the equilibrium quantity of dollars exchanged.

THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET


 THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET
  • The wide-reaching collection of markets and institutions that handle the exchange of foreign currencies is known as the foreign exchange market. In this market, the participants use one currency to purchase another currency. 
  • The foreign exchange market operates worldwide and is by far the largest market in the world in terms of cash value traded. Being an over-the-counter market, it is not a physical place; rather, it is an electronically linked network of big banks, dealers and foreign exchange brokers who bring buyers and sellers together. 
  • With no central trading location and no set hours of trading, the foreign exchange market involves enormous volume of foreign exchange trading worldwide. The participants such as firms, households, and investors who demand and supply currencies represent themselves through their banks and key foreign exchange dealers who respond to market signals transmitted instantly across the world.
  •  The foreign exchange markets operate on very narrow spreads between buying and selling prices. But since the volumes traded are very large, the traders in foreign exchange markets stand to make huge profits or losses.
  • The major participants in the exchange market are central banks, commercial banks, governments, foreign exchange Dealers, multinational corporations that engage in international trade and investments, nonbank financial institutions such as asset- management firms, insurance companies, brokers, arbitrageurs and speculators.
  •  The central banks participate in the foreign exchange markets, not to make profit, but essentially to contain the volatility of exchange rate to avoid sudden and large appreciation or depreciation of domestic currency and to maintain stability in exchange rate in keeping with the requirements of national economy. If the domestic currency fluctuates excessively, it causes panic and uncertainty in the business world. Commercial banks participate in the foreign exchange market either on their own account or for their clients. 
  • When they trade on their own account, banks may operate either as speculators or arbitrageurs/or both. The bulk of currency transactions occur in the interbank market in which the banks trade with each other. Foreign exchange brokers participate in the market as intermediaries between different dealers or banks. Arbitrageurs profit by discovering price differences between pairs of currencies with different dealers or banks.
  •  Speculators, who are bulls or bears, are deliberate risk-takers who participate in the market to make gains which result from unanticipated changes in exchange rates. Other participants in the exchange market are individuals who form only a very insignificant fraction in terms of volume and value of transactions.
  • Regardless of physical location, and given that the markets are highly integrated, at any given moment, all markets tend to have the same exchange rate for a given currency. This phenomenon occurs because of arbitrage. Arbitrage refers to the practice of making risk-less profits by intelligently exploiting price differences of an asset at different dealing locations. 
  • There is potential for arbitrage in the forex market if exchange rates are not consistent between currencies. When price differences occur in different markets, participants purchase foreign exchange in a low-priced market for resale in a high-priced market and makes profit in this process. Due to the operation of price mechanism, the price is driven up in the low- priced market and pushed down in the high-priced market. 
  • This activity will continue until the prices in the two markets are equalized, or until they differ only by the amount of transaction costs involved in the operation. Since forex markets are efficient, any profit spread on a given currency is quickly arbitraged away. 

In the foreign exchange market, there are two types of transactions:
(i) current transactions which are carried out in the spot market and the exchange involves immediate delivery, and

(ii) contracts to buy or sell currencies for future delivery which are carried out in forward and/or futures markets

Exchange rates prevailing for spot trading (for which settlement by and large takes two days) are called spot exchange rates. The exchange rates quoted in foreign exchange transactions that specify a future date are called forward exchange rates. The currency forward contracts are quoted just like spot rate; however, the actual delivery of currencies takes place at the specified time in future. When a party agrees to sell euro for dollars on a future date at a forward rate agreed upon, he has ‘sold euros forward’ and ‘bought dollars forward’. A forward premium is said to occur when the forward exchange rate is more than a spot trade rates. On the contrary, if the forward trade is quoted at a lower rate than the spot trade, then there is a forward discount. Currency futures, though conceptually similar to currency forward and perform the same function, they are distinct in their nature and details concerning settlement and delivery.

While a foreign exchange transaction can involve any two currencies, most transactions involve exchanges of foreign currencies for the U.S. dollars even when it is not the national currency of either the importer or the exporter. On account of its critical role in the forex markets, the dollar is often called a ‘vehicle currency’.

NOMINAL VERSUS REAL EXCHANGE RATES


NOMINAL VERSUS REAL EXCHANGE RATES
  • We have been discussing so far about nominal exchange rate which simply states how much of one currency (i.e. money) can be traded for a unit of another currency when prices are constant. When prices of goods and services change in either or both countries, it would be difficult to know the change in relative prices of foreign goods and services.
  •  Therefore, Real Exchange Rate (RER) which incorporates changes in prices is a better measure. The ‘real exchange rate' describes ‘how many’ of a good or service in one country can be traded for ‘one’ of that good or service in a foreign country. It is calculated as :
             Real exchange rate = Nominal exchange rate X domestic price index/foreign price index

Another exchange rate concept, the Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) is the nominal effective exchange rate (a measure of the value of a domestic currency against a weighted average of variouis foreign currencies) divided by a price deflator or index of costs. An increase in REER implies that exports become more expensive and imports become cheaper; therefore, an increase in REER indicates a loss in trade competitiveness.

THE EXCHANGE RATE REGIMES


 THE EXCHANGE RATE REGIMES


An exchange rate regime is the system by which a country manages its currency in respect to foreign currencies. It refers to the method by which the value of the domestic currency in terms of foreign currencies is determined. There are two major types of exchange rate regimes at the extreme ends; namely:

(i) floating exchange rate regime (also called a flexible exchange rate), and

(ii) fixed exchange rate regime

Under floating exchange rate regime, the equilibrium value of the exchange rate of a country’s currency is market-determined i.e the demand for and supply of currency relative to other currencies determine the exchange rate. There is no predetermined target rate and the exchange rates are likely to change at every moment in time depending on the changing demand for and supply of currency in the market. There is no interference on the part of the government or the central bank of the country in the determination of exchange rate. Any intervention by the central banks in the foreign exchange market (through purchases or sales of foreign currency in exchange for local currency) is intended for only moderating the rate of change and preventing undue fluctuations in the exchange rate, rather than for establishing a particular level for it. Nevertheless, in a few countries (for example, New Zealand, Sweden, the United States), the central banks almost never interfere to administer the exchange rates. Nearly all advanced economies follow floating exchange rate regimes. Some large emerging market economies also follow the system.

A fixed exchange rate, also referred to as pegged exchanged rate, is an exchange rate regime under which a country’s Central Bank and/ or government announces or decrees what its currency will be worth in terms of either another country’s currency or a basket of currencies or another measure of value, such as gold. For example: a certain amount of rupees per dollar. (When a government intervenes in the foreign exchange market so that the exchange rate of its currency is different from what the market would have produced, it is said to have established a “peg” for its currency). In order to sustain a fixed exchange rate, it is not enough that a country pronounces a fixed parity: it must also make concentrated efforts to defend that parity by being willing to buy (or sell) foreign reserves whenever the market demand for foreign currency is lesser (or greater) than the supply of foreign currency. In other words, in order to maintain the exchange rate at the predetermined level, the central bank intervenes in the foreign exchange market.

We are often misled to think that it is common for countries to adopt the flexible exchange rate system. In the real world, there is a spectrum of ‘intermediate exchange rate regimes’ which are either inflexible or have varying degrees of flexibility that lie in between these two extremes (fixed and flexible). For example, a central bank can implement soft peg and hard peg policies. A soft peg refers to an exchange rate policy under which the exchange rate is generally determined by the market, but in case the exchange rate tend to be move speedily in one direction, the central bank will intervene in the market. With a hard peg exchange rate policy, the central bank sets a fixed and unchanging value for the exchange rate. Both soft peg and hard peg policy require that the central bank intervene in the foreign exchange market. The tables 4.4.1 and 4.4.2 show respectively, the IMF classifications and definitions of prevalent exchange rate systems and the latest available data (as on April 30, 2016) on the distribution of the 189 IMF members based on their exchange rate regimes.
                                                            Table No: 4.4.1
                                 IMF Classifications and Definitions of Exchange Rate Regimes

Exchange Rate Regimes

Description
Exchange                     arrangements separate legal tender

Dollarization
with
no
Currency of another country circulates as sole legal tender or member belongs to a monetary or currency union in which same legal tender is shared by members
of the union.
Currency Board Arrangements

Hong Kong Dollar
Monetary regime based on implicit national commitment to exchange domestic currency for a specified foreign
currency at a fixed exchange rate.
Other       conventional      fixed       peg arrangement

Chinese Yuan
Country pegs its currency (formal or de facto) at a fixed rate to a major currency or a basket of currencies where exchange rate fluctuates within a narrow margin or
at most ± 1% around central rate
Pegged exchange rates within horizontal bands
Value of the currency is maintained within margins of fluctuation around a formal or de facto fixed peg that are
wider than ± 1% around central rate.
Crawling Peg
Currency is adjusted periodically in small amounts at a fixed, preannounced rate in response to changes in certain
quantitative indicators.
Crawling Bands
Currency is maintained within certain fluctuation margins say ( ±1-2 %) around a central rate that is adjusted
periodically
Managed       floating       within       no preannounced path for exchange rate:

Indian Rupee
Monetary authority influences the movements of the exchange rate through active intervention in foreign exchange markets without specifying a pre-announced path for the exchange
rate
Independent floating

US Dollar, Japanese Yen, New Zealand Dollar
Exchange rate is market determined, with any foreign exchange intervention aimed at moderating the rate of change and preventing undue fluctuations in the exchange rate, rather than at
establishing a level for it

Table No:  4.4.2

Distribution of IMF Members Based on Exchange Regime
Exchange Rate Arrangement
% of IMF Members
Hard peg
13.0
No separate legal tender
7.3
Currency board
5.7
Soft peg
39.6
Conventional peg
22.9
Stabilized arrangement
9.4
Crawling peg
1.6
Crawl-like arrangement
5.2
Pegged exchange rate within horizontal bands
0.5
Floating
37.0
Floating
20.8
Free floating
16.1
Other managed Arrangements
10.4


Source: Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions, IMF


In an open economy, the main advantages of a fixed rate regime are:

I. A fixed exchange rate avoids currency fluctuations and eliminates exchange rate risks and transaction costs that can impede international flow of trade and investments. A fixed exchange rate can thus greatly enhance international trade and investment.

II. A fixed exchange rate system imposes discipline on a country’s monetary authority and therefore is more likely to generate lower levels of inflation.

III. The government can encourage greater trade and investment as stability encourages investment.

IV. Exchange rate peg can also enhance the credibility of the country’s monetary- policyI. However, in the fixed or managed floating (where the market forces are allowed to determine the exchange rate within a band) exchange rate regimes, the central bank is required to stand ready to intervene in the foreign exchange market and, also to maintain an adequate amount of foreign exchange reserves for this purpose.

Basically, the free floating or flexible exchange rate regime is argued to be efficient and highly transparent as the exchange rate is free to fluctuate in response to the supply of and demand for foreign exchange in the market and clears the imbalances in the foreign exchange market without any control of the central bank or the monetary authority. A floating exchange rate has many advantages:

(i) A floating exchange rate has the great advantage of allowing a Central bank and /or government to pursue its own independent monetary policy

(ii) Floating exchange rate regime allows exchange rate to be used as a policy tool: for example, policy-makers can adjust the nominal exchange rate to influence the competitiveness of the tradeable goods sector

(iii) As there is no obligation or necessity to intervene in the currency markets, the central bank is not required to maintain a huge foreign exchange reserves.

However, the greatest disadvantage of a flexible exchange rate regime is that volatile exchange rates generate a lot of uncertainties in relation to international transactions, and add a risk premium to the costs of goods and assets traded across borders. In short, a fixed rate brings in more currency and monetary stability and credibility; but it lacks flexibility. On the contrary, a floating rate has greater policy flexibility; but less stability.