Showing posts with label PUBLIC FINANCE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PUBLIC FINANCE. Show all posts

STRATEGIC FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK


STRATEGIC FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING FRAME WORK
Capital investment is the springboard for wealth creation. In a world of economic uncertainty, the investors want to maximize their wealth by selecting optimum investment and financial opportunities that will give them maximum expected returns at minimum risk. Since management is ultimately responsible to the investors, the objective of corporate financial management should implement investment and financing decisions which should satisfy the shareholders by placing them all in an equal, optimum financial position. The satisfaction of the interests of the shareholders should be perceived as a means to an end, namely maximization of shareholders’ wealth. Since capital is the limiting factor, the problem that the management will face is the strategic allocation of limited funds between alternative uses in such a manner, that the companies have the ability to sustain or increase investor returns through a continual search for investment opportunities that generate funds for their business and are more favourable for the investors. 

Therefore, all businesses need to have the following three fundamental essential elements:
  • A clear and realistic strategy, 
  • The financial resources, controls and systems to see it through and
  •  The right management team and processes to make it happen.
We may summarise this by saying that:

Strategy + Finance + Management = Fundamentals of Business
Strategy may be defined as the long term direction and scope of an organization to achieve competitive advantage through the configuration of resources within a changing environment for the fulfilment of stakeholder’s aspirations and expectations. In an idealized world, management is ultimately responsible to the investors. Investors maximize their wealth by selecting optimum investment and financing opportunities, using financial models that maximize expected returns in absolute terms at minimum risk. What concerns the investors is not simply maximum profit but also the likelihood of it arising: a risk-return trade-off from a portfolio of investments, with which they feel comfortable and which may be unique for each individual.

We call this overall approach strategic financial management and define it as being the application to strategic decisions of financial techniques in order to help achieve the decision-maker's objectives. Although linked with accounting, the focus of strategic financial management is different. Strategic financial management combines the backward-looking, report-focused discipline of (financial) accounting with the more dynamic, forward-looking subject of financial management. It is basically about the identification of the possible strategies capable of maximizing an organization's market value. It involves the allocation of scarce capital resources among competing opportunities. It also encompasses the implementation and monitoring of the chosen strategy so as to achieve agreed objectives. 

STABILIZATION FUNCTION


 STABILIZATION FUNCTION

The theoretical rationale for the stabilization function of the government is derived from the Keynesian proposition that a market economy does not automatically generate full employment and price stability and therefore the governments should pursue deliberate stabilization policies. Business cycles are natural phenomena in any economy and they tend to occur periodically. The market system has inherent tendencies to create business cycles. The market mechanism is limited in its capacity to prevent or to resolve the disruptions caused by the fluctuations in economic activity. In the absence of appropriate corrective intervention by the government, the instabilities that occur in the economy in the form of recessions, inflation etc. may be prolonged for longer periods causing enormous hardships to people especially the poorer sections of society. It is also possible that a situation of stagflation (a state of affairs in which inflation and unemployment exist side by side) may set in and make the problem more intricate.

The stabilization issue also becomes more complex as the increased international interdependence causes forces of instability to get easily transmitted from one country to other countries This is also known as contagion effect”.

The stabilization function is one of the key functions of fiscal policy and aims at eliminating macroeconomic fluctuations arising from suboptimal allocation. As you might recall, the economic crisis that engulfed the world in 2008 and the more recent euro area crisis have highlighted the importance of macroeconomic stability and has, therefore, revived interest in countercyclical fiscal policy.

The stabilization function is concerned with the performance of the aggregate economy in terms of:

  •  labour employment and capital utilization, 
  •  overall output and income, 
  •  general price levels, 
  •  balance of international payments, and 
  •  the rate of economic growth. 
Government’s fiscal policy has two major components which are important in stabilizing the economy:
1. an overall effect generated by the balance between the resources the government puts into the economy through expenditures and the resources it takes out through taxation, charges, borrowing etc.

2. a microeconomic effect generated by the specific policies it adopts.

Government’s stabilization intervention may be through monetary policy as well as fiscal policy. Monetary policy has a singular objective of controlling the size of money supply and interest rate in the economy which in turn would affect consumption, investment and prices. Fiscal policy for stabilization purposes attempts to direct the actions of individuals and organizations by means of its expenditure and taxation decisions. On the expenditure side, Government can choose to spend in such a way that it stimulates other economic activities. For example, government expenditure on building infrastructure may initiate a series of productive activities. Production decisions, investments, savings etc can be influenced by its tax policies.

REDISTRIBUTION FUNCTION


 REDISTRIBUTION FUNCTION

You might have noticed that over the past decades there has been tremendous expansion in economic activities which has generated enormous increase in aggregate output and wealth. However, the outcomes of this growth have not spread evenly across the households. A major function of present-day governments therefore involves changing the pattern of distribution of income from what the market would offer to a more egalitarian one. The distribution responsibility of the government arises from the fact that, left to the market, the distribution of income and wealth among individuals in the society is likely to be skewed and therefore the government has to intervene to ensure a more desirable and just distribution.

The distributive function of budget is related to the basic question of for whom should an economy produce goods and services. As such, it is concerned with the adjustment of the distribution of income and wealth so as to ensure distributive justice namely, equity and fairness. The distribution function also relates to the manner in which the effective demand over the economic goods is divided among the various individual and family spending units of the society. Effective demand is determined by the level of income of the households and this in turn determines the distribution of real output among the population.

The distribution function of the government aims at:
  •  redistribution of income to achieve an equitable distribution of societal output among households 
  •  advancing the well-being of those members of the society who suffer from deprivations of different types 
  •  providing equality in income, wealth and opportunities 
  •  providing security for people who have hardships, and 
  •  ensuring that everyone enjoys a minimal standard of living 
A few examples of the redistribution function (or market intervention for socio- economic reasons) performed by governments are:
  •  taxation policies of the government whereby progressive taxation of the rich is combined with provision of subsidy to the poor households 
  •  proceeds from progressive taxes used for financing public services, especially those that benefit low-income households (example, supply of essential food grains at highly subsidized prices to BPL households)
  •  employment reservations and preferences to protect certain segments of the population, 
  •  regulation of the manufacture and sale of certain products to ensure the health and well-being of consumers, and 
  •  special schemes for backward regions and for the vulnerable sections of the population

THE ALLOCATION FUNCTION


 THE ALLOCATION FUNCTION
  • Resource allocation refers to the way in which the available factors of production are allocated among the various uses to which they might be put. It determines how much of the various kinds of goods and services will actually be produced in an economy. One of the most important functions of an economic system is the optimal or efficient allocation of scarce resources so that the available resources are put to their best use and no wastages are there. 
  • As we know, the private sector resource allocation is characterized by market supply and demand and price mechanism as determined by consumer sovereignty and producer profit motives. The state’s allocation, on the other hand, is accomplished through the revenue and expenditure activities of governmental budgeting. In the real world, resource allocation is both market determined and government determined. 
  • A market economy is subject to serious malfunctioning in several basic respects. There is also the problem of nonexistence of markets in a variety of situations. While private goods will be sufficiently provided by the market, public goods will not be produced in sufficient quantities by the market. Why do markets fail to give right answers to the question as to what goods should be produced and in what quantities? In other words, why do markets generate misallocation of resources? 
Efficient allocation of resources is assumed to take place only in perfectly competitive markets. In reality, markets are never perfectly competitive. Market failures which hold back the efficient allocation of resources occur mainly due to the following reasons:
  •  Imperfect competition and presence of monopoly power in different degrees leading to under-production and higher prices than would exist under conditions of competition. These distort the choices available to consumers and reduce their welfare. 
  •  Markets typically fail to provide collective goods which are, by their very nature, consumed in common by all the people. 
  •  Externalities which arise when the production and consumption of a good or service affects people and they cannot influence through markets the decision about how much of the good or service should be produced e.g. pollution. 
  •  Factor immobility which causes unemployment and inefficiency 
  •  Imperfect information, and 
  •  Inequalities in the distribution of income and wealth. 

According to Musgrave, the state is the instrument by which the needs and concerns of the citizens are fulfilled and therefore, public finance is connected with economic mechanisms that should ideally lead to the effective and optimal allocation of limited resources. This logic, in effect, makes it necessary for the government to intervene in the market to bring about improvement in social welfare. In the absence of appropriate government intervention, market failures may occur and the resources are likely to be misallocated by too much production of certain goods or too little production of certain other goods. The allocation responsibility of the governments involves suitable corrective action when private markets fail to provide the right and desirable combination of goods and services. Briefly put, market failures provide the rationale for government’s allocative function.

You might have noticed that in many cases, the government can provide us with goods and services that we cannot produce on our own or buy at a price from the market. For example, the government establishes property rights and makes the necessary arrangements for enforcing contracts through provision of law enforcement and courts. Goods which involve externalities that are not met by the market require intervention by the government for corrective measures. Merit goods which are greatly beneficial to the society also fall under the purview ofprovision by the government. These interventions do not imply that markets are replaced by government action. In its allocation role, the government acts as a complement rather than as a substitute to the market system in an economy.

The resource allocation role of government’s fiscal policy focuses on the potential for the government to improve economic performance through its expenditure and tax policies. The allocative function in budgeting determines who and what will be taxed as well as how and on what the government revenue will be spent. It is concerned with the provision of public goods and the process by which the total resources of the economy are divided among various uses and an optimum mix of various social goods (both public goods and merit goods). The allocation function also involves the reallocation of society’s resources from private use to public use.

A variety of allocation instruments are available by which governments can influence resource allocation in the economy. For example,
  •  government may directly produce the economic good(for example, electricity and public transportation services)
  • government may influence private allocation through incentives and disincentives (for example, tax concessions and subsidies may be given for the production of goods that promote social welfare and higher taxes may be imposed on goods such as cigarettes and alcohol)
  •  government may influence allocation through its competition policies, merger policies etc which will affect the structure of industry and commerce ( for example, the Competition Act in India promotes competition and prevents anti-competitive activities)
  •  governments’ regulatory activities such as licensing, controls, minimum wages, and directives on location of industry influence resource allocation
  • government sets legal and administrative frameworks, and
  •  any of a mixture of intermediate techniques may be adopted by governments

Maximizing social welfare is one of the primary and most commonly manifest reasons for government intervention in the market. However, it is also possible that instead of eliminating market distortions, sometimes governments may contribute to generate them. The possible sources of this type of government failures are inadequate information, conflicting objectives and administrative costs involved in government intervention.

THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM


 THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM

  • We shall first consider why an economic system should be in place. The basic economic problem of scarcity arises from the fact that on account of qualitative as well as quantitative constraints, the resources available to any society cannot produce all economic goods and services that its members desire to have. 
  • Therefore, an economic system should exist to answer the basic questions such as what, how and for whom to produce and how much resources should be set apart to ensure growth of productive capacity. The modern society, in general, offers three alternate economic systems through which the decisions of resource reallocation may be made namely, the market, the government and a mixed system where both markets and governments simultaneously determine resource allocation. 
  • Adam Smith is often described as a bold advocate of free markets and minimal governmental activity. However, Smith saw an important resource allocation role for government when he underlined the role of government in national defence, maintenance of justice and the rule of law, establishment and maintenance of highly beneficial public institutions and public works which the market may fail to produce on account of lack of sufficient profits.
  •  Since the 1930s, more specifically as a consequence of the great depression, the state’s role in the economy has been distinctly gaining in importance and therefore, the traditional functions of the state as described above, have been supplemented with what is referred to as economic functions (also called fiscal functions or public finance function).
  • While there are differences among different countries in respect to the nature and extent of government intervention in economies, all governments are still expected to play a major role. This comes out of the belief that government intervention will invariably influence the performance of the economy in a positive way. 
  • Richard Musgrave, in his classic treatise ‘The Theory of Public Finance’ (1959), introduced the three branch taxonomy of the role of government in a market economy. Musgrave believed that, for conceptual purposes, the functions of government are to be separated into three, namely, resource allocation, (efficiency), income redistribution (fairness) and macroeconomic stabilization. The allocation and distribution functions are primarily microeconomic functions, while stabilization is a macroeconomic function.
  •  The allocation function aims to correct the sources of inefficiency in the economic system while the distribution role ensures that the distribution of wealth and income is fair. Monetary and fiscal policy, the problems of macroeconomic stability, maintenance of high levels of employment and price stability etc fall under the stabilization function. We shall now discuss in detail this conceptual three function framework of the responsibilities of the government.

INTRODUCTION (FISCAL FUNCTION)


 INTRODUCTION (FISCAL FUNCTION)

The following are a few headlines which appeared recently in the leading business dailies:

1. Crop worry: Centre scraps import duty on wheat to ease supply and check prices

2. Monetary Policy panel members voted unanimously for a rate cut

3. A fortified mid -day meal gets underway at Karnataka’s government schools

4. Government to spend ` 60,000 crores more on rural jobs

5. Government looking at subsidizing Smart phones to boost digital payments

6. No service tax on credit, debit card transactions up to ` 2,000

Each of the above statements represents a proactive response on the part of the government to achieve certain objectives in the interest of the economy and the society.

What exactly is the government planning to accomplish by the above measures? On close examination, we can find that the first two steps are intended to control potential rise in prices; the next two seek to bring in welfare to the underprivileged sections of the society by ensuring equity and fairness and the remaining two are meant to provide incentives to promote the production/ use of resources in a socially desirable direction. The government does not expect the economic variables underlying the above mentioned phenomena to function automatically;  rather it intervenes to direct them to function in particular directions. Such intervention on the part of the government is based on the belief that the objective of the economic system and the role of government is to improve the well being of individuals and households.

We have experienced in our day to day life that though governments at various levels impose many rules and regulations in the economy, some matters still go unregulated. Similarly, most of the goods and services that we consume are provided to us by private producers, but certain goods and services are provided exclusively by the government. For a variety of reasons, we believe that governments should accomplish some activities and should not do others. The purpose of this lesson is to examine the economic functions of the government and to understand why the government should invariably perform them.