EFFECT OF NOTICE TO ACTING PARTNER (SECTION 24)
According to section 24, notice to a partner who habitually acts in the business of the firm of any matter relating to the auairs of the firm operates as notice to the firm, except in the case of a fraud on the firm committed by or with the consent of that partner.
Analysis of section 24:
The notice to a partner, who habitually acts in business of the firm, on matters relating to the affairs of the firm, operates as a notice to the firm except in the case of a fraud on the firm committed by or with the consent of that partner. Thus, the notice to one is equivalent to the notice to the rest of the partners of the firm, just as a notice to an agent is notice to his principal. This notice must be actual and not constructive. It must be received by a working partner and not by a sleeping partner. It must further relate to the firm’s business. Only then it would constitute a notice to the firm.
Example:
P, Q, and R are partners in a business for purchase and sale of second hand goods. R purchases a second hand car on behalf of the firm from S. In the course of dealings with S, he comes to know that the car is a stolen one and it actually belongs to X. P and Q are ignorant about it. All the partners are liable to X, the real owner.
The only exception would lie in the case of fraud, whether active or tacit.
Example:
A, a partner who actively participates in the management of the business of the firm, bought for his firm, certain goods, while he knew of a particular defect in the goods. His knowledge as regards the defect,ordinarily, would be construed as the knowledge of the firm, though the other partners in fact were not aware of the defect. But because A had, in league with his seller, conspired to conceal the defect from the other partners, the rule would be inoperative and the other partners would be entitled to reject the goods, upon detection by them of the defect.
No comments:
Post a Comment