SUIT FOR DAMAGES
Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract (Section 73)
When a contract has been broken, the party who suuers by such a breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, which naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach, or which the parties knew, when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it.
Such compensation is not to be given for any remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach.
Compensation for failure to discharge obligation resembling those created by contract: When an obligation resembling those created by contract has been incurred and has not been discharged, any person injured by the failure to discharge it is entitled to receive the same compensation from the party in default, as if such person had contracted to discharge it and had broken his contract.
Explanation to Section 73
In estimating the loss or damage arising from a breach of contract, the means which existed of remedying the inconvenience caused by the non-performance of the contract must be taken into account.
Analysis of Section 73
The Act, in Section 73, has laid down the rules as to how the amount of compensation is to be determined. On the breach of the contract, the party who suuers from such a breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him by breach.
Compensation can be claimed for any loss or damage which naturally arises in the usual course of events.
A compensation can also be claimed for any loss or damage which the party knew when they entered into the contract, as likely to result from the breach.
That is to say, special damage can be claimed only on a previous notice. But the party suuering from the breach is bound to take reasonable steps to minimise the loss.
No compensation is payable for any remote or indirect loss.
No comments:
Post a Comment