ELEMENTS VITIATING FREE CONSENT(UNDUE INFLUENCE)


Undue influence (Section 16)


According to section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, “A contract is said to be induced by ‘undue influence’ where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and he uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other”.

A person is deemed to be in position to dominate the will of another:

(a) Where he holds a real or apparent authority over the other; or

(b) Where he stands in a fiduciary relationship to the other; or

(c) Where he makes a contract with a person whose mental capacity is temporarily or permanently auected by reason of age, illness or mental or bodily distress for example, an old illiterate person.
 
Example 1:

A having advanced money to his son, B, during his minority, upon B’s coming of age obtains, by misuse of parental influence, a bond from B for a greater amount than the sum due in respect of the advance. A employs undue influence.
Analysis of Section 16

The essential ingredients under this provision are:

(1) Relation between the parties: A person can be influenced by the other when a near relation between the two exists.

(2) Position to dominate the will: Relation between the parties exist in such a manner that one of them is in a position to dominate the will of the other. A person is deemed to be in such position in the following circumstances:

     (a) Real and apparent authority: Where a person holds a real authority over the other as in the case of master and servant, doctor and patient and etc.

Example: A father, by reason of his authority over the son can dominate the will of the son.

    (b) Fiduciary relationship: Where relation of trust and confidence exists between the parties to a contract. Such type of relationship exists between father and son, solicitor and client, husband and wife, creditor and debtor, etc.

Example: By reason of fiduciary relationship, a solicitor can dominate the will of his client and a trustee can dominate the will of the beneficiary.

    (c) Mental distress: An undue influence can be used against a person to get his consent on a contract where the mental capacity of the person is temporaily or permanently auected by the reason of mental or bodily distress, illness or of old age.

Example: A doctor is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of his patient enfeebled by protracted illness.

    (d) Unconscionable bargains: Where one of the parties to a contract is in a position to dominate the will of the other and the contract is apparently unconscionable i.e., unfair, it is presumed by law that consent must have been obtained by undue influence. Unconscionable bargains are witnessed mostly in money-lending transactions and in gifts.

Example
: A youth of 18 years of age, spend thrift and a drunkard, borrowed ` 90,000 on a bond bearing compound interest at 2% per mensem (p.m.). It was held by the court that the transaction is unconscionable, the rate of interest charged being so exorbitant [Kirpa Ram vs. Sami-Ud-din Ad. Khan (1903)]

(3) The object must be to take undue advantage: Where the person is in a position to influence the will of the other in getting consent, must have the object to take advantage of the other.

(4) Burden of proof: The burden of proving the absence of the use of the dominant position to obtain the unfair advantage will lie on the party who is in a position to dominate the will of the other.

No comments:

Post a Comment