DETERMINATION OF EQUILIBRIUM INCOME: THREE SECTOR MODEL
Aggregate demand in
the three sector model of closed economy (neglecting foreign trade) consists of three components namely, household consumption(C),
desired business investment demand(I) and the government sector’s demand for
goods and services(G). Thus in equilibrium, we have
Since there is no foreign sector, GDP and national income
are equal. As prices are
Y =
C+ I + G (2.13)
assumed to be fixed, all variables are real
variables and all changes are in real terms. To help interpret these
conditions, we turn to the flowchart below.
Each of the variables in the model is a flow variable
Circular
Flow in a Three Sector Economy
The functioning of
the two sectors namely household and the business sector has been discussed by
us in the two sector model. The
three-sector, three-market circular flow model which accounts for government
intervention highlights the role played by the government sector. From the
above flow chart, we can find that the government sector adds the following key
flows to the model:
i. Taxes on households and business sector to fund
government purchases
ii. Transfer payments to household sector and subsidy
payments to the business sector
iii. Government purchases goods and services from business
sector and factors of production from household sector, and
iv. Government borrowing in financial markets to finance
the deficits occurring when taxes fall short of government purchases.
However, unlike in the two sector model, the whole of
national income does not return directly to the firms as demand for output.
There are two flows out of the household sector in addition to consumption
expenditure namely, saving flow and the flow of tax payments to the government.
These are actually leakages. The saving
leakage flows into financial markets, which means that the part of that is
saved is held in the form of some financial asset (currency, bank deposits,
bonds, equities, etc.). The tax flow goes to to the government sector. The
leakages which occur in household sector do not necessarily mean that the total
demand must fall short of output. There are additional demands for output on
the part of the business sector itself
for investment and from the government sector. In terms of the circular flow, these are injections. The
investment injection is shown as a flow from financial markets to the business
sector. The purchasers of the investment goods, typically financed by
borrowing, are actually the firms in the business sector themselves. Thus, the
amount of investment in terms of money represents an equivalent flow of funds
lent to the business sector.
The three-sector Keynesian model is commonly constructed
assuming that government purchases are autonomous. This is not a realistic
assumption, but it will simplify our
analysis. Determination of income can be explained with the help of figure 1.2.7
Determination of Equilibrium Income: Three Sector Model
The line S + T in the graph plots the value of savings plus taxes. This schedule slopes upwards because saving varies positively with income. Just as government spending, level of tax receipts (T) is decided by policy makers.
The equilibrium level of income is shown at the point E 1
where the (C + l + G) schedule crosses the 45° line, and aggregate demand is
therefore equal to income (Y). In equilibrium, it is also true that the (S + T)
schedule intersects the (I + G) horizontal schedule.
We shall now see why other points on the graph are not
points of equilibrium. Consider a level of income below Y. We find that it
generates consumption as shown along the
consumption function. When this level of consumption is added
to the autonomous expenditures (I + G), aggregate demand exceeds income;
the (C + I + G) schedule is above the
45° line. Equivalently at this point I + G is greater than S + T, as can be
seen in panel B of the figure 1.2.7. With demand outstripping production,
desired investments will exceed actual investment and there will be an
unintended inventory shortfall and therefore a tendency for output to rise.
Conversely, at levels of income above Y1, output will exceed demand; people are not willing to buy all that is produced.
Excess inventories will accumulate, leading businesses to reduce their future
production. Employment will subsequently decline. Output will fall back
to the equilibrium level. It is only at Y that output is equal to aggregate
demand; there is no unintended inventory shortfall or accumulation and,
consequently, no tendency for output to change. An important thing to note is
that the change in total spending, followed by changes in output and
employment, is what will restore equilibrium in the Keynesian model, not
changes in prices.
DETERMINATION
OF EQUILIBRIUM INCOME: FOUR SECTOR
MODEL
The four sector model includes all four macroeconomic
sectors, the household sector, the business sector, the government sector, and
the foreign sector. The foreign sector includes households, businesses, and
governments that reside in other countries. The following flowchart shows the
circular flow in a four sector economy Figure 1.2.8
Circular Flow in a Four Sector Economy
In the four sector model, there are three additional flows namely: exports, imports and net capital inflow which is the difference between capital outflow and capital inflow. The C+I+G+(X-M) line indicates the total planned expenditures of
consumers, investors, governments, and foreigners (net
exports) at each income level. In equilibrium, we have
The domestic economy trades goods with the foreign sector
through exports and imports. Exports are the injections in the national income, while imports act as
leakages or outflows of national income. Exports represent foreign demand for
domestic output and therefore, are part of aggregate demand. Since imports
are not demands for domestic goods, we
must subtract them from aggregate demand. The demand for imports has an
autonomous component and is assumed to depend on income. Imports depend upon
marginal propensity to import which is the increase in import demand per unit
increase in GDP. The demand for exports depends on foreign income and is
therefore exogenously determined. Imports are subtracted from exports to derive
net exports, which is the foreign sector's contribution to aggregate
expenditures. With the help of figure 1.2.9, we shall explain income
determination in the four sector model.
Figure 1.2.9
Determination of Equilibrium Income: Four Sector
Equilibrium is identified as the intersection between the C
+ I + G + (X - M) line and the 45-degree line. The equilibrium
income is Y. From panel B, we find that the leakages(S+T+M) are equal to
injections (I+G+X) only at equilibrium level of income.
We have seen above that only net exports(X-M) are
incorporated into the four sector model
of income determination. We know that injections increase the level of income and leakages decrease it.
Therefore, if net exports are positive (X > M), there is net injection and
national income increases.
Conversely, if X<M, there is net withdrawal and national income decreases.
The figure 1.2.10 depicts a case of X<M.
We find that when the foreign sector is included in the
model (assuming M > X), the aggregate demand schedule C+I+G shifts
downward with equilibrium point shifting from F to E. The inclusion of foreign
sector (with M > X) causes a reduction in national income from Y0 to Y1.
Nevertheless, when X > M, the aggregate demand schedule C+I+G shifts upward
causing an increase in national income. Learners may infer diagrammatic
expressions for possible changes in equilibrium income for X>M and X = M.
Figure 1.2.10
Effects on Income When Imports are
where v is the propensity to import which is
greater
than zero. You may recall that the multiplier in a closed economy is (1−𝑏𝑏)
The greater the value of v, the lower will be the autonomous
expenditure multiplier. The more open an economy is to foreign trade, (the
higher v is) the smaller will be the response of income to aggregate demand
shocks, such as changes in government spending or autonomous changes in
investment demand. A change in autonomous expenditures— for example, a change
in investment spending,—will have a direct effect on income and an induced
effect on consumption with a further effect on income. The higher the value of
v, larger the proportion of this induced effect on demand for foreign, not
domestic, consumer goods. Consequently, the induced effect on demand for
domestic goods and, hence on domestic income will be smaller. The increase in
imports per unit of income constitutes an additional leakage from the circular
flow of (domestic) income at each round of the multiplier process and reduces
the value of the autonomous expenditure multiplier.
An increase in demand for exports of a country is an
increase in aggregate demand for domestically produced output and will increase
equilibrium income just as an increase in government spending or an autonomous
increase in investment. In summary, an increase in the demand for a country’s
exports has an expansionary effect on equilibrium income, whereas an autonomous
increase in imports has a contractionary effect on equilibrium income. However,
this should not be interpreted to mean that exports are good and imports
harmful in their economic effects. Countries import goods that can be more
efficiently produced abroad, and trade increases the overall efficiency of the
worldwide allocation of resources. This forms the rationale for attempts to
stimulate the domestic economy by promoting exports and restricting imports.
CONCLUSION
According to the Keynesian theory of income and employment,
national income depends upon the aggregate effective demand. If the aggregate
effective demand falls short of that output at which all those who are both
able and willing to work are employed,
it will result in unemployment in the economy. Consequently, there will be a
gap between the economy's actual and optimum potential output. On the contrary,
if the aggregate effective demand exceeds the economy's full employment output (production capacity), it
will result in inflation. Nominal output will increase, but it simply
reflects higher prices, rather than additional real output.
It is not necessary that the equilibrium aggregate output will also be the full
employment aggregate output. It is undesirable and a cause of great concern
for the society and government if large
number of people remains unemployed. In the absence of government policies to
stabilize the economy, incomes will be unstable because of the instability of
investment.
By making appropriate
changes in government spending (G) and taxes, the government can counteract the
effects of shifts in investment. Appropriate changes in fiscal policy by
adjusting in government expenditure and taxes could keep
the autonomous expenditure constant even in the face of undesirable changes in
the investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment