DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND ILLEGAL AGREEMENT

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND ILLEGAL AGREEMENT

Basis of difference
Void agreement
Illegal agreement
Scope
A void agreement is not necessarily illegal.
An illegal agreement is always void.
Nature
Not forbidden under law.
Are forbidden under law.
Punishment
Parties     are     not      liable      for     any punishment under the law.
Parties to illegal agreements are liable for punishment.
Collateral Agreement
It’s not necessary that agreements collateral to void agreements may also be void. It may be valid also.
Agreements      collateral       to      illegal agreements are always void.

 http://www.comgurukul.com/educational-books/gst-book/

TYPES OF CONTRACT (ON THE BASIS OF THE VALIDITY)


TYPES OF CONTRACT

 On the basis of the validity

1. Valid Contract: An agreement which is binding and enforceable is a valid contract. It contains all the essential elements of a valid contract.

2. Void Contract: Section 2 (j) states as follows: “A contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to be enforceable”. Thus a void contract is one which cannot be enforced by a court of law.

Example: Mr. X agrees to write a book with a publisher. After few days, X dies in an accident. Here the contract becomes void due to the impossibility of performance of the contract.

Example: A contracts with B (owner of the factory) for the supply of 10 tons of sugar, but before the supply is euected, the fire caught in the factory and everything was destroyed. Here the contract becomes void.

It may be added by way of clarification here that when a contract is void, it is not a contract at all but for the purpose of identifying it, it has to be called a [void] contract.

3. Voidable Contract: Section 2(i) defines that “an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties thereto, but not at the option of the other or others is a voidable contract”.

This in fact means where one of the parties to the agreement is in a position or is legally entitled or authorized to avoid performing his part, then the agreement is treated and becomes voidable.
Such a right might arise from the fact that the contract may have been brought about by one of the parties by coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation and hence the other party has a right to treat it as a voidable contract.

At this juncture it would be desirable to know the distinction between a Void Contract and a Voidable Contract. The distinction lies in three aspects namely definition, nature and rights. These are elaborated here under:

(a) Definition: A void contract cannot be enforced at all. A voidable contract is an agreement which is enforceable only at the option of one of the parties but not at the option of the other. Therefore ‘enforceability’ or otherwise, divides the two types of contracts.

(b) Nature: By nature, a void contract is valid at the time when it is made but becomes unenforceable and thus void on account of subsequent developments or events like supervening impossibility, subsequent illegality etc., Repudiation of a voidable contract also renders the contract void. Similarly a contingent contract might become void when the occurrence of the event on which it is contingent becomes impossible.

On the other hand voidable contract would remain valid until it is rescinded by the person who has the option to treat it as voidable. The right to treat it as voidable does not invalidate the contract until such right is exercised. All contracts caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation are voidable. Generally, a contract caused by mistake is void.

(c) Rights: As regards rights of the parties, in the case of a void contract there is no legal remedy for the parties as the contract cannot be performed in any way. In the case of voidable contract the aggrieved party has a right to rescind it within a reasonable time. If it is so rescinded, it becomes void. If it is not rescinded, it is a valid contract.

ESSENTIALS OF A VALID CONTRACT

ESSENTIALS OF A VALID CONTRACT
                                                    

                         Essentials of a valid contract



As given by Section 10 of Indian Contract Act, 1872

Not given by Section 10 but are also considered essential
1
Agreement
1
Two parties
2
Free consent
2
Intention to create legal relationship
3
Competency of the parties
3
Fulfillment of legal formalities
4
Lawful consideration
4
Certainty of meaning
5
Legal object
5
Possibility of performance
6
Not expressly declared to be void
6
-


 http://www.comgurukul.com/educational-books/gst-book/

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT

Difference between Agreement and Contract

Basis of differences
Agreement
Contract
Meaning
Every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other. Ouer + Acceptance
Agreement enforceable by law. Agreement + Legal enforceability
Scope
It’s a wider term including both legal and social agreement.
It is used in a narrow sense with the specification that contract is only legally enforceable agreement.
Legal obligation
It may not create legal obligation. An agreement does not always grant rights to the parties
Necessarily creates a legal obligation. A contract always grants certain rights to every party.
Nature
All agreement are not contracts.
All contracts are agreements.

 http://www.comgurukul.com/educational-books/gst-book/

WHAT IS CONTRACT?


WHAT IS A CONTRACT?

The term contract is defined under section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as-
“an agreement enforceable by law”.


The contract consists of two essential elements:

(i) an agreement, and

(ii) its enforceability by law.

(i) Agreement - The term ‘agreement’ given in Section 2(e) of the Act is defined as- “every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other”.

To have an insight into the definition of agreement, we need to understand promise.
Section 2 (b) defines promise as-

“when the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent there to, the proposal is said to be accepted. Proposal when accepted, becomes a promise”.

The following points emerge from the above definition :
1. when the person to whom the proposal is made

2. signifies his assent on that proposal which is made to him

3. the proposal becomes accepted

4. accepted proposal becomes promise

Thus we say that an agreement is the result of the proposal made by one party to the other party and that other party gives his acceptance thereto of course for mutual consideration. 

Agreement = Ouer/Proposal + Acceptance

(ii) Enforceability by law – An agreement to become a contract must give rise to a legal obligation which means a duly enforceable by law.

Thus from above definitions it can be concluded that –

Contract = Accepted proposal/Agreement + Enforceability by law

On elaborating the above two concepts, it is obvious that contract comprises of an agreement which is a promise or a set of reciprocal promises, that a promise is the acceptance of a proposal giving rise to a binding contract. Further, section 2(h) requires an agreement to be worthy of being enforceable by law before it is called‘contract’. Where parties have made a binding contract, they created rights and obligations between themselves.


THE LAW OF CONTRACT (INTRODUCTION)


The Law of contract: Introduction

As a result of increasing complexities of business environment, innumerable contracts are entered into by the parties in the usual course of carrying on their business. ‘Contract’ is the most usual method of defining the rights and duties in a business transaction. This branch of law is diuerent from other branches of law in a very important respect. It does not prescribe so many rights and duties, which the law will protect or enforce; it contains a number of limiting principles subject to which the parties may create rights and duties for themselves. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 codifies the legal principles that govern ‘contracts’. The Act basically identifies the ingredients of a legally enforceable valid contract in addition to dealing with certain special type of  like indemnity, guarantee, bailment, pledge, quasi contracts, contingent contracts etc.

All agreements are not studied under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as some of those are not contracts. Only those agreements, which are enforceable by law, are contracts.

This unit refers to the essentials of a legally enforceable agreement or contract. It sets out rules for the ouer and acceptance and revocation thereof. It states the circumstances when an agreement is voidable or enforceable by one party only, and when the agreements are void, i.e. not enforceable at all.

CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP (CDS) IN INDIA


 CDS in India

In India, RBI has come out guidelines on CDS in corporate bonds in 2011 which was revised in 2013.

As per the guidelines CDS players have been divided into following two categories:

(a) Market Makers: - These are comprised of commercial banks, primary dealers (PDS) and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs). They can buy or sell without any underlying position in the bond i.e. Naked CDS.

(b) Users: - These are comprised of mutual funds (MFs), Insurance Companies, Housing Finance Companies, Provident Funds, Listed Companies and Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs). They can use CDS only as a hedge tool to offset the risk of an underlying position, and are not allowed to sell CDS other than to exit the existing long positions.